Brandel Chamblee’s relentless opposition to LIV Golf is about more than just stats or playing styles—it’s about values, transparency, and the cost of ambition
Whether LIV Golf survives or thrives, Chamblee has carved out a distinct place in the golf discourse. Love him or hate him, he’s asking questions that most in the industry are too afraid—or too compromised—to raise.
As the LIV-PGA battle unfolds, don’t expect Brandel Chamblee to soften his stance anytime soon. If anything, the more LIV grows, the louder his voice is likely to become.
Whether you agree with Brandel Chamblee or not, his criticisms are grounded in real data. LIV Golf’s viewership numbers remain undeniably low in the U.S., especially considering the billions spent.
Its lack of traction among traditional golf fans and the constant need to defend its relevance are red flags.
Yet it’s also true that the story of LIV Golf is far from over. With enough time, innovation, and perhaps reconciliation with the PGA Tour, it may yet carve out a sustainable future.
For now, Chamblee’s jabs sting — and likely resonate with many. But if LIV’s leadership truly believes in its vision, they’ll have to do more than just prove Chamblee wrong on X. They’ll need to prove him wrong in living rooms across America.
Also Read: Who Is Brandel Chamblee Wife? Exploring Bailey Chamblee Age & Wikipedia
Table of Contents
Brandel Chamblee Renews Offensive Against LIV Golf
On Sunday, golf analyst Brandel Chamblee reignited his long-running criticism of LIV Golf, the controversial Saudi-funded breakaway tour.
Known for being one of LIV’s most outspoken critics, Chamblee took to social media to highlight statistics suggesting a decline in major championship performance among LIV players.
His comments quickly reignited debate in the golf world and beyond.
Accusations of Sportswashing and Political Motives
Chamblee didn’t hold back in his remarks, claiming that LIV Golf’s true purpose has little to do with elevating the game.
Instead, he accused the Saudi-backed tour of being a vehicle for Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) and the Public Investment Fund (PIF) to obscure their human rights abuses and legitimize their regime through sport.
“They are only concerned with how the players can help MBS/PIF obscure their human rights abuses and diversify their economy,” Chamblee wrote on X (formerly Twitter).
He called the players “puppets” who “sold their businesses at a discount” in exchange for large paychecks and fleeting fame.
But each person who acquiesced to the inconveniences that the Nazis imposed upon the Jews, in some small way contributed to the holocaust.
To take the money of a country that seeks to oppress their own people and to kill those who speak out against their oppression, is… https://t.co/4MFUik0lGQ
— Brandel Chamblee (@chambleebrandel) May 12, 2025
LIV Golfers’ Major Performances: A Statistical Decline
Chamblee’s attack was prompted by a post analyzing the performances of LIV Golf players in major tournaments since defecting from the PGA Tour.
The post revealed that 14 of 18 LIV golfers who’ve played in at least three majors since joining the tour have posted worse scoring averages compared to their pre-LIV performances.
Players like Jon Rahm, Brooks Koepka, and others were reportedly more effective in majors before they aligned themselves with the PIF-funded circuit.
While the drop-off doesn’t necessarily mean LIV Golf is the direct cause, it provides ammunition for critics like Chamblee who argue that the format, competition level, and overall lack of seriousness are detrimental to players’ form and focus.
Brandel Chamblee Calls Out Bryson DeChambeau
Just days before this outburst, Chamblee had already lashed out at Bryson DeChambeau, one of LIV Golf’s most recognizable stars.
DeChambeau had complained about the difficulty of bunkers during a LIV event in Mexico.
Chamblee responded harshly, calling him a “puppet for a murderous dictator,” a comment that sparked outrage among LIV supporters and even neutral fans.
To many, the remark appeared excessive and personal. But Chamblee remained unapologetic, doubling down on his moral stance against the entire LIV project.
Fan Reactions: A Divided Audience
Chamblee’s fiery remarks, as expected, sparked polarized reactions. While some supported his moral stand, others accused him of virtue signaling or ignoring the complexity of the situation.
One fan responded by defending LIV players, arguing that turning down “generational wealth to play a game” would be foolish.
Chamblee quickly shot back:
“The fact that you think anyone who would turn down profit for principle is a sad commentary on the past few decades… and you.”
His sharp retort reflects a growing frustration with what he sees as the moral apathy of modern professional athletes and fans alike.
The Broader Issue: Morality vs. Money
Chamblee’s criticism taps into a much broader and more complicated debate: Should athletes be held accountable for the ethics of the organizations or countries that fund their sport?
LIV Golf is not the first example of sportswashing—Formula 1, soccer, and even boxing have seen wealthy Gulf states invest heavily in an effort to reshape public perception.
Yet, few pundits in any sport have been as relentless as Chamblee in opposing it.
His arguments are clear: Money shouldn’t come at the cost of integrity, and athletes have a responsibility to consider where their paychecks are coming from.
Brandel Chamblee: LIV Golf’s Response and Media Strategy
While LIV Golf has largely chosen to ignore Chamblee’s criticism publicly, their communications and branding make a deliberate effort to emphasize player empowerment, global expansion, and economic opportunity.
They argue that LIV is about evolving golf and giving athletes the compensation they deserve.
For LIV loyalists, the performance dip in majors is explained by scheduling differences, travel fatigue, or even media bias. Some believe PGA-affiliated broadcasters and analysts like Chamblee are simply protecting their own turf.
PGA Tour vs. LIV: The Battle for Golf’s Soul
The PGA Tour and LIV Golf remain locked in a battle for control, prestige, and relevance. Although a proposed merger involving the PIF was discussed in 2023, it hasn’t resulted in full integration, and distrust remains on both sides.
PGA loyalists like Rory McIlroy have softened their stance over time, but Chamblee has remained consistent in his opposition.
He’s even gone so far as to say that any future reconciliation between the tours should involve serious scrutiny of Saudi influence and player accountability—a stance unlikely to be embraced by LIV’s roster of stars.
Are LIV Golfers Regretting Their Decision?
While many LIV players have earned enormous sums—some signing deals in the range of $100 million+—the question remains: has it all been worth it?
Diminished competitive form, exclusion from team events like the Ryder Cup, and fan backlash may be affecting their legacies.
Jon Rahm, one of LIV’s biggest gets, has admitted to missing the tradition and intensity of PGA Tour events.
Other players have expressed frustration about scheduling, broadcast visibility, and even event atmosphere. Despite the riches, some may be quietly questioning their choices.
Is Chamblee Right?
Whether you agree with Brandel Chamblee or not, it’s impossible to ignore the moral and competitive questions he raises.
His critics argue he’s too harsh, even sanctimonious, while his supporters believe he’s one of the few voices in golf willing to stand up for principle in the face of overwhelming wealth and power.
One thing is clear: Chamblee has forced a conversation that goes far beyond sand traps and scorecards.
As LIV Golf continues to grow, and as the PGA Tour attempts to adapt, the future of professional golf hangs in the balance.
Will fans continue to care about the ethics behind tournaments? Will players find a way to blend financial opportunity with moral responsibility?
More importantly, will critics like Chamblee eventually be remembered as visionaries… or as stubborn gatekeepers unwilling to accept the sport’s evolution?
Also Read: Patrick Cantlay (Golf): Who Is He? Bio, Wiki, Age, Career, Wife, Family and More
Brandel Chamblee Takes Aim at LIV Golf’s Struggles
Veteran golf analyst Brandel Chamblee has once again found himself in the headlines after taking a firm shot at LIV Golf, the Saudi-backed breakaway tour.
Known for his outspoken takes and unwillingness to mince words, Chamblee ridiculed LIV’s television viewership, comparing it unfavorably to local college football games.
The scathing commentary comes amid continued efforts by LIV Golf to establish legitimacy within the global sports landscape.
A Billion-Dollar Investment With Modest Returns
LIV Golf’s financial backers, led by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), have poured an estimated $10 billion into the venture.
This includes lavish signing bonuses for top PGA Tour defectors, extravagant tournament setups, and aggressive marketing campaigns.
However, despite the enormous investment, the league has consistently failed to draw significant TV audiences, especially in the U.S. market.
Chamblee, a frequent critic of LIV Golf, seized on this point to make his latest jab. Responding to a social media user who claimed that LIV was “here to stay,” the 62-year-old analyst wrote:
“You sure about that? 10 billion dollars in and they can’t draw an audience larger than a local college football game.”
LIV Golf’s Viewership Numbers Under the Microscope
The tipping point for Chamblee’s comments was the recent LIV Golf Mexico event, where Joaquin Niemann claimed victory.
According to reports, Fox Sports 1 (FS1) registered only 110,000 viewers during the final round of the tournament — numbers far from impressive when measured against traditional PGA Tour broadcasts.
Even though the league showed improvement between days — with Saturday drawing 84,000 viewers, up significantly from Friday — the numbers paled in comparison to mainstream golf events.
For example, Justin Thomas’ win at the RBC Heritage attracted a massive 4.36 million viewers on CBS, a stark contrast that highlights LIV Golf’s struggle to break into the mainstream U.S. sports audience.
Brandel Chamblee’s History of Criticism Toward LIV Golf
This is far from the first time Brandel Chamblee has called out LIV Golf. Ever since the league’s inception, Chamblee has been among its most vocal detractors.
A former PGA Tour pro turned Golf Channel analyst, Chamblee has long criticized the ethics behind LIV Golf, particularly its financial ties to Saudi Arabia and the country’s human rights record.
In past interviews and appearances, Chamblee has referred to LIV defectors as “sportswashing pawns” and accused them of turning a blind eye to the source of their new fortunes.
His critiques haven’t just been philosophical; he’s repeatedly questioned the long-term viability and popularity of the LIV model.
A War of Words Sparked by Bunker Complaints
The latest online spat originated not directly from LIV’s TV ratings but from comments made by Bryson DeChambeau.
The 2020 U.S. Open champion, known for his scientific approach to golf, had voiced displeasure with the bunker conditions at Club de Golf Chapultepec during the Mexico event.
DeChambeau’s remarks about the “unfair” nature of the bunkers didn’t sit well with Chamblee.
In a follow-up post, Chamblee labeled the golfer a “puppet for a murderous dictator,” referencing DeChambeau’s allegiance to the Saudi-funded tour.
This explosive accusation sparked reactions from fans and LIV supporters alike. One fan, defending LIV’s staying power, prompted Chamblee’s viral reply about viewership figures.
View this post on Instagram
Golf Fans Divided Over Chamblee’s Remarks
Unsurprisingly, golf fans are split on Chamblee’s persistent criticism. Supporters of LIV Golf argue that the tour is still in its infancy and needs time to grow organically.
They claim that the unique team-based format, international reach, and roster of elite talent will eventually attract younger and more global viewers.
Critics, however, side with Chamblee. They contend that despite its financial muscle and headline-grabbing signings, LIV has failed to cultivate a genuine fanbase.
They also point to the lack of meaningful competition and absence of historical prestige as major hurdles to sustained interest.
Comparing Golf Audiences: PGA Tour vs LIV
To understand the debate, it’s worth comparing typical viewership numbers. PGA Tour events, especially those broadcast on major networks like CBS or NBC, often draw millions of viewers, especially during final rounds.
Even mid-tier events like the Valspar Championship or Travelers Championship frequently cross the 1 million mark.
In contrast, LIV events remain on cable outlets with limited reach in the U.S., such as FS1 or CW, and have yet to secure international deals with major broadcast partners.
This has severely hampered their visibility, even as they host events in global markets like Australia, Singapore, and Spain.
Also Read: Karl Vilips Reflects on Iconic Encounter with Golf Idol Rickie Fowler
