Don Cherry’s observation cuts to the heart of what playoff hockey is about. Skill gets you there, but grit often wins it. And in 2025, the Edmonton Oilers may have learned that lesson the hard way—by missing their toughest scorer when it mattered most
It’s impossible to say with certainty that Zach Hyman would have won the Oilers the Cup. But in a series defined by tight games and low margins, it’s entirely plausible he could have made a major difference.
Whether by jamming in a rebound, setting a screen, or simply firing up the team with a big hit, Hyman’s presence might have tilted one or two games—and that’s all it takes in the Final.
In an era where sports media constantly shifts and personalities come and go, Don Cherry remains a steady presence for fans who appreciate his unique voice.
The rumors of his retirement were just that—rumors. Cherry will be back, more opinionated and energetic than ever, once the puck drops again in the fall.
As he himself said: “I’m coming back next season, I can’t wait.”
For fans of The Grapevine Podcast, that’s all they needed to hear.
Also Read: J.T. Miller (Hockey): Meet His Wife, Bio, Age, Career, Playing Style, Marriage Life and More
Also Read: Craig Fulton: Expand India’s Base as They Begin Hockey Pro League Campaign
Don Cherry’s Perspective: Hyman Was the Missing Piece
Don Cherry, never shy about voicing his opinion, didn’t hesitate to point out what he believed was a critical void in the Oilers’ lineup.
“I really do,” Cherry said on his Grapevine podcast. “He would’ve kicked in a few goals and been in front of the net. Good guy in front of the net.”
Cherry’s remarks zero in on an often-overlooked aspect of hockey success: net-front presence. In a series that featured low-scoring, tight-checking games, the kind of gritty goals that Hyman specializes in could have turned the tide.
Cherry’s belief isn’t based on sentimentality—it’s rooted in a firm understanding of playoff hockey and what it takes to win the Stanley Cup.
Hyman’s Playoff Impact Before the Injury
Before being sidelined with an upper-body injury sustained during the Western Conference Final, Hyman was a force. His 11 points were hard-earned, and he consistently disrupted opposing defenses by parking himself in front of the crease.
Beyond the points, his physicality—leading all playoff players with 111 hits—made life miserable for defenders and goalies alike.
These qualities don’t just impact box scores—they tilt the ice. A net-front agitator can screen goalies, force defensive mistakes, and open lanes for linemates.
Against a structured Florida team that thrived on limiting second chances, Hyman’s presence could have created crucial chaos.
Florida’s Defense vs. Hyman’s Style
The Florida Panthers executed a defensive masterclass in the Stanley Cup Final. They clogged shooting lanes, cleared rebounds, and boxed out effectively.
Without Hyman, the Oilers lacked a reliable net-front disruptor. While players like Evander Kane and Warren Foegele provided some grit, none matched Hyman’s blend of scoring touch and physical edge.
A healthy Hyman might have drawn more attention in front of Bobrovsky, possibly pulling defenders out of position and opening up opportunities for McDavid or Draisaitl. This is exactly the type of presence Cherry believes could’ve tipped the scale.
Game-by-Game Breakdown: Where Hyman Could’ve Made a Difference
-
Game 1 (Panthers win 3–2): The Oilers had trouble creating traffic in front of the net. Hyman’s presence could’ve made Bobrovsky’s life more difficult.
-
Game 3 (Oilers win 4–3 OT): Edmonton showed their offensive capability, but a second net-front option might have ended it earlier.
-
Game 4 (Panthers win 2–1): A one-goal loss where gritty scoring might have made the difference. This was a textbook “Hyman goal” type of game.
-
Game 6 (Panthers clinch 3–1): With the Cup on the line, the Oilers couldn’t generate dangerous chances from in close—an area where Hyman thrives.
Cherry’s argument gains weight when viewed through this lens. Each of these games hung in the balance, and just one or two timely greasy goals from Hyman could have shifted momentum.
Don Cherry’s History of Supporting Gritty Players
Cherry has long championed the value of grinders, power forwards, and sandpaper players.
From Wendel Clark to Cam Neely to Hyman, Cherry has always praised those who make their living in the dirty areas of the ice.
His support for Hyman is consistent with his broader philosophy: playoff success is built not just on finesse, but on toughness and determination.
In Hyman, Cherry sees a player who personifies these traits, and his absence—according to Cherry—is a big reason why the Oilers fell short.
Injuries are a cruel reality of the NHL postseason. Every champion has to battle through adversity, and every runner-up has at least one “what if” storyline. For the Oilers, that story is now intertwined with Hyman’s absence.
Edmonton’s Path Forward
While Hyman’s absence in the Final will sting for some time, the Oilers are still in a strong position moving forward.
With a core group of McDavid, Draisaitl, Bouchard, and hopefully a fully healthy Hyman in 2026, Edmonton remains a legitimate Cup contender.
However, Cherry’s comments may lead Oilers management to further emphasize depth and net-front grit in roster building.
Finding a player who can replicate Hyman’s role—or ensuring his health throughout a deep playoff run—will be critical in the coming years.
Cherry’s comment isn’t just speculation—it’s a broader commentary on how thin the margin for error is in the Stanley Cup Final.
Losing a player like Hyman, who epitomizes playoff-style hockey, might not seem devastating in the moment, but in a six-game series, those inches matter.
Also Read: Ladd McConkey’s Wife Spotted with Chargers WR? Social Media Explodes Over Honeymoon Pic